From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] manual: add section about depending on target and toolchain options
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D50D0.8060906@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXLV59szv9d-7FJJdGE=cOvvDowTTZGpWep5vyFFxJ2jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/03/13 09:34, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Hi Arnout,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>> On 09/25/13 10:56, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> [..]
>>> Notes:
>>> - How we will specify the C library is currently marked as 'to be
>>> decided'.
>>> This patch series does not yet unify that, but I plan to do that in a new
>>> patch (or update this series if we can reach a decision shortly). The
>>> problem
>>> is that not all packages that have a dependency on e.g. glibc add a
>>> comment to
>>> show this to the user. A proposal would be to have a comment like:
>>> foo needs a (e)glibc toolchain w/ featA, featB, featC
>>> where the '(e)glibc' string would be left out if there is no constraint on
>>> the
>>> C library.
>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. Though for glibc there is only one feature AFAIK: C++.
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here. I think that some packages depend on
> an (e)glibc toolchain because it requires certain features that are
> lacking in uclibc. I haven't checked for the details though. It may be
> the presence of certain system calls.
(e)glibc always has all features enabled, except for C++ (and RPC in
some cases but I don't think we have those).
Which is fortunate, because it means the additional (e)glibc part isn't
likely to make the line too long.
[snip]
>>> +** Comment string: +dynamic library+
>>
>>
>> For the sake of brevity, maybe "DLL"?
>
> DLL really has a Windows annotation for me. Moreover, it's not so
> commonly used in the Linux world, don't you think?
True. I'm just thinking that this is a pretty long string, that in
addition is likely to be combined with a lot of other things.
The dynamic library support is anyway a bit of a problem, because it
bears little relation to the config option "prefer static libraries".
That part, however, will hopefully be fixed when the other Thomas adds
the choice between static-only, dynamic-only and both.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 8:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Unification of comments on toolchain option dependencies Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] trivial: manual: fix typo formating --> formatting Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-25 9:05 ` Samuel Martin
2013-10-06 19:48 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] manual: add section about depending on target and toolchain options Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-03 5:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-03 7:34 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-03 11:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-03 11:15 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-10-03 11:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-25 8:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3 of 3 v2] Config.in files: unify comments of toolchain option dependencies Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-02 20:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Unification of comments on " Thomas De Schampheleire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D50D0.8060906@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox