[Buildroot] [PATCH 7/9] manual: get-involved.txt: fix event order

[Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>]

On 10/08/13 11:31, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   docs/manual/get-involved.txt | 10 ++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/manual/get-involved.txt b/docs/manual/get-involved.txt
>> index 8515d34..49ab54c 100644
>> --- a/docs/manual/get-involved.txt
>> +++ b/docs/manual/get-involved.txt
>> @@ -84,6 +84,12 @@ Currently, this page is mainly used as a _todo-list_.
>>   Events
>>   ------
>>
>> +Buildroot Developer Days aside FOSDEM 2012 (February 3, 2012 - Brussels)
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +
>> +* Announcement & agenda thread: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-January/049340.html[]
>> +* Report: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-February/050371.html[]
>> +
>>   Buildroot Developer Days aside ELC-E 2012 (November 3-4, 2012 - Barcelona)
>>   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> @@ -94,8 +100,4 @@ Buildroot presentation at LSM 2012 (July 12-14, 2012 - Geneva)
>>
>>   * Announcement: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-May/053845.html[]
>>
>> -Buildroot Developer Days aside FOSDEM 2012 (February 3, 2012 - Brussels)
>> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> -* Announcement & agenda thread: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-January/049340.html[]
>> -* Report: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-February/050371.html[]
>> --
>
> What is the meaning of 'aside' here ?
> For me, aside means 'next to' in a spatial context.
> In this case, I think we are rather talking about time, in the sense
> that BDD are before or after the mentioned conference. I'm not sure if
> there exists a word like aside/adjacent that can be used in a time
> context, but otherwise we could use:
>
> ... prior to ...
> ... after ...

  I think "alongside" is correct. Any native English speaker who can confirm?

  Regards,
  Arnout

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F