Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] toolchain-external: update Linaro ARM toolchain
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:01:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5257BE84.5020901@lucaceresoli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131010095744.5690a242@skate>

Thomas, Arnout,

Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:53:49 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
>>    I believe I asked this before: do we really want to remove external
>> toolchains without going through a deprecation cycle? Why do we offer in
>> a released buildroot three different Linaro toolchain versions that are
>> all gcc 4.8 and that you cannot use anymore three months later?
>
> Linaro toolchains are released every month, so they are moving quickly.
> What are you proposing to do to handle this?
>
> Have just a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LINARO_ARM option, which maps
> automatically to the latest version of the toolchain, like we do for
> packages?
>
> Or do you suggest to preserve toolchains? For how long?
>
> Until now, the arbitrarily chosen policy was to keep only three
> versions of a given toolchain. For Sourcery CodeBench toolchains, I
> believe it works quite well because the frequency of releases is not
> too high. However, it's true that for Linaro toolchains, it may not be
> appropriate, but I'm not sure what to do exactly.

I also would like toolchains to be maintained in BR a little longer, at 
least one year.

Of course maintaining 12 Linaro toolchains would be quite annoying and 
probably useless.

So we may want to add only those Linaro toolchains that have relevant 
changes, say they upgrade gcc or provide some shiny new feature. But 
this may be risky: a newly introduced feature is more likely to be 
buggy. So... how about the 2nd or 3rd release after a relevant change? 
Uhm, quite fuzzy indeed.

Or, more simply, add only one Linaro toolchain per each Buildroot release.

-- 
Luca

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-11  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-09 14:06 [Buildroot] [git commit] toolchain-external: update Linaro ARM toolchain Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-10  6:53 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-10  7:57   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-11  9:01     ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2013-10-11  9:16       ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-11  9:29         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-11 10:19           ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-11 10:23             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-11 11:40               ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-11 11:50                 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-11 12:11                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-11 12:15                     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-11 12:22                       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-11 13:05                         ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5257BE84.5020901@lucaceresoli.net \
    --to=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox