From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] About user support and the mailing list
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:56:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525F0B82.1050709@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXtbwTCy_ZWVSsgTjefP2qrHkob0Oia2qN8fd-7sez5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 15/10/13 21:44, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Peter Korsgaard<jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>"Ryan" == Ryan Barnett<rjbarnet@rockwellcollins.com> writes:
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> > >> That would separate the high traffic/fast reading parts from the
>> > >> low traffic/philosophical discussion parts.
>> >
>> > Ryan> I really like this idea as I believe it fits well with how this
>> > Ryan> FOSS project works. The majority of the emails are related to
>> > Ryan> patches and discussion surrounding them. I usually glance through
>> > Ryan> these emails since I don't necessarily have time to read through
>> > Ryan> all of the patches. So by having this separation would be nice
>> > Ryan> as that way I don't accidentally glance over a philosophical
>> > Ryan> discussion such as this.
>> >
>> >The problem is that these things are rarely nicely seperated. This
>> >thread started as a reply to a patch submission.
> This is not necessarily a big problem. If a discussion occurs on the
> 'patch' mailing list that is no longer directly related with the
> actual patch, we should at least put the 'discussion' mailing list in
> copy (or use only that list). In the beginning this can be odd, but
> it's something we can learn.
I was first against the -patch / -discuss split for the same reasons as
Peter's, but as you say, it's easy to add -discuss to a reply.
If this split goes through, I'd keep buildroot at busybox.net as the
-discuss list and create a new one for patches.
Patchwork should probably listen to both, since people will (certainly
in the beginning) still send patches to the normal list.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 10:15 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package: fix 'local' site method for host packages Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-14 19:59 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-15 8:25 ` [Buildroot] About user support and the mailing list Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-15 13:04 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-15 13:16 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-10-15 14:30 ` Ryan Barnett
2013-10-15 16:07 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-10-15 19:44 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-16 21:56 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-10-16 16:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525F0B82.1050709@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox