From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] udisks: only build documentation if requested
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:03:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528CEB78.1050203@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LWDaws1VFNq77tLJXtOgafg3DQ-7J6k3xGXznn5ta_PsA@mail.gmail.com>
On 20/11/13 09:27, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >> -UDISKS_CONF_OPT = --disable-remote-access
>> >> +UDISKS_CONF_OPT = --disable-remote-access \
>> >> + $(if $(BR2_HAVE_DOCUMENTATION),,--disable-man-pages)
>>
>> > Since BR2_HAVE_DOCUMENTATION is deprecated, shouldn't we disable the
>> > man pages unconditionally?
>>
>> We could, but so far we haven't removed BR2_HAVE_DOCUMENTATION, so I
>> kept it for now.
>>
>> I'm planning on removing the option very soon in the 2014.02 cycle.
>
> Ok, great.
> Do we have an overview when which deprecated features will be removed?
For reference, here's a list of when things were deprecated:
2012-11-10 BR2_HAVE_DOCUMENTATION
2013-09-19 BR2_INSTALL_OBJC
2013-09-19 BR2_INSTALL_FORTRAN
2013-01-24 BR2_GDB_VERSION_7_2
2013-01-24 BR2_GDB_VERSION_7_3
2012-12-11 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_1
2012-12-11 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_3
2012-12-11 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_5
2013-03-01 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_6
2013-04-05 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_7
2013-06-08 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_8
2013-09-03 BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_3_9
2010-04-09 BR2_PACKAGE_SQUASHFS3 (therefore BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS3)
2012-11-10 BR2_PACKAGE_AUTOCONF
2012-11-10 BR2_PACKAGE_AUTOMAKE
2012-12-09 BR2_PACKAGE_CCACHE
2010-09-20 BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA
2012-11-03 BR2_PACKAGE_NETKITBASE
2012-11-03 BR2_PACKAGE_NETKITTELNET
2012-10-22 BR2_PACKAGE_PKG_CONFIG
2012-03-18 BR2_PACKAGE_TTCP
2013-03-25 BR2_PACKAGE_VALA
2012-12-18 BR2_PACKAGE_XSTROKE
Note: it's quite a bit of work to generate this list since I didn't
find a way to do it automatically, so I propose to save it somewhere :-)
As to which ones can be removed: I think that things should be kept
around for at least a year (i.e. 4 releases), to give users a little bit
of time to react. So that means that everything that was deprecated
before 2013 can be removed.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-19 22:49 [Buildroot] [git commit] udisks: only build documentation if requested Peter Korsgaard
2013-11-20 8:20 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-11-20 8:25 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-11-20 8:27 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-11-20 17:03 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528CEB78.1050203@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox