From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:48:53 +0000
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] sawman: Link using gcc instead of ld
In-Reply-To: <52A5B06E.60204@imgtec.com>
References: <1386347428-4142-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
 <20131206190836.637fc9f7@skate> <52A5ADCD.5050307@imgtec.com>
 <52A5B06E.60204@imgtec.com>
Message-ID: <52A5F475.6030303@imgtec.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 12/09/2013 11:58 AM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 11:47 AM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>> On 12/06/2013 06:08 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>>> Dear Vicente Olivert Riera,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:30:28 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>>>
>>>> +--- SaWMan-1.6.3/wm/sawman/Makefile.in.orig    2013-12-06
>>>> 14:22:22.675409826 +0000
>>>> ++++ SaWMan-1.6.3/wm/sawman/Makefile.in    2013-12-06
>>>> 16:04:03.383752843 +0000
>>>
>>> Makefile.in is generated from Makefile.am. So we shouldn't be fixing
>>> Makefile.in, but instead Makefile.am or the process that generates
>>> Makefile.in from Makefile.am.
>>>
>>> What happens if you simply add:
>>>
>>> SAWMAN_AUTORECONF = YES
>>>
>>>   ?
>>
>> You still have the same problem.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Adding:
>
> LD = $(CC) -nostdlib
>
> to Makefile.am and also:
>
> SAWMAN_AUTORECONF = YES
>
> to sawman.mk fixes the problem.
>
> What do you think about this solution?
>

Yes this is preferred. You should patch configure.ac or Makefile.am (if 
they are available) and run autoreconf as suggested.

-- 
markos