From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] lua-modules: choice between Lua 5.1.x & Lua 5.2.x
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D575B6.3050401@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389705298-27263-4-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org>
On 14/01/14 14:14, Francois Perrad wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad<francois.perrad@gadz.org>
> ---
> package/lbase64/Config.in | 4 ++++
> package/lua-ev/lua-ev.mk | 2 +-
> package/lua-msgpack-native/Config.in | 4 ++++
> package/lua-msgpack-native/lua-msgpack-native.mk | 3 ++-
> package/luaexpat/Config.in | 4 ++++
> package/luaexpatutils/Config.in | 4 ++++
> package/luaexpatutils/luaexpatutils.mk | 2 +-
> package/luaposix/Config.in | 2 +-
> package/luaposix/luaposix.mk | 2 +-
> package/luarocks/luarocks.mk | 4 ++--
> package/luasec/Config.in | 4 ++++
I wonder if this patch shouldn't be squashed with the first one - I
guess without this patch, all these packages are broken when 5.2 is selected.
> 11 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/lbase64/Config.in b/package/lbase64/Config.in
> index ca9dd5d..9cc2e2b 100644
> --- a/package/lbase64/Config.in
> +++ b/package/lbase64/Config.in
> @@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
> config BR2_PACKAGE_LBASE64
> bool "lbase64"
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LUA_INTERPRETER
> + depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_LUA_5_2
I think this should be "depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LUA_5_1", because this
package most likely still won't work when a Lua 5.3 is added in the
future. But of course, to make that possible you need a
BR2_PACKAGE_LUAINTERPRETER_ABI_5_1 symbol.
> help
> A base64 library for Lua
>
> http://luaforge.net/projects/lbase64/
> +
> +comment "lbase64 only with Lua 5.1"
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LUA_5_2
To make it consistent with the toolchain comments, I'd write:
comment "lbase64 needs a Lua 5.1 interpreter"
Regards,
Arnout
[snip]
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 13:14 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] choice between Lua 5.1.x & 5.2.x Francois Perrad
2014-01-14 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] lua: choice between " Francois Perrad
2014-01-14 17:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-01-15 19:40 ` François Perrad
2014-01-14 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] lua: add official patches Francois Perrad
2014-01-14 17:27 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-01-14 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] lua-modules: choice between Lua 5.1.x & Lua 5.2.x Francois Perrad
2014-01-14 17:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2014-01-15 19:42 ` François Perrad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D575B6.3050401@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox