From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] new package - generate iso with isolinux bootloader
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:33:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E7E9E4.20400@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128172502.171b2f84@skate>
On 28/01/14 17:25, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:24:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
>> First a generic comment. Is there any reason not to simply replace the
>> iso9660 filesystem? That one is currently using grub as a bootloader, but
>> it doesn't work very well. So I think this patch is very valuable to get
>> the iso9660 filesystem working properly again. But as it is now, it is
>> too complex to be included in buildroot. See my comments below.
>
> What doesn't work with the current iso9660 filesystem support that is
> grub based? I've tested it recently, and it was working. I've even
> pushed a few improvements to it.
To be honest it has been a couple of years since I tried it, and I
don't remember exactly. Here are a few issues that I can think of now.
* It doesn't actually build a rootfs, but rather a bootable image.
* grub has issues cross-compiling between x86_64 and i386 - but your
recent patches may have fixed that.
* Bug#6092 (closed now, but not at the time I posted it).
* The issue that grub was built without iso support (fixed now, but not
at the time I posted it).
Possibly iso9660 is working reliably by now.
>> A second generic comment is about the choice of booting with an
>> initramfs. Why not boot with a (rockridge) iso9660 rootfs? Clearly it
>> puts a bit more strain on the kernel config since iso9660 as well as the
>> bus drivers (sata, usb) have to be linked in, but I think that would be a
>> much nicer solution. This type of image containing the actual rootfs in a
>> different format should really be generated by a post-image script
>> instead of a filesystem target. Can the rest of the list give their opinion?
>
> I don't think that ISO9660 supports symbolic links, ownership,
> permissions, device files and all these Unix filesystem features that
> are typically needed to use a given filesystem type as a Linux root
> filesystem.
That's what RockRidge is for.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 9:22 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] new package - generate iso with isolinux bootloader jean
2013-08-16 11:49 ` Jean Sorgemoel
2013-08-20 22:24 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-01-28 16:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-28 17:33 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2014-01-28 21:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-29 7:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-01-29 8:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-01 21:33 ` jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-01-15 0:24 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] update package isolinux bootloader - simplify code jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-01-28 16:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-29 7:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-01-28 16:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] new package - generate iso with isolinux bootloader Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-01 21:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] add bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image (isolinux) jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-02-02 16:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-04 23:49 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] add option for iso9660 filesystem image jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-02-04 23:49 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/2] add bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image (isolinux) jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-02-17 7:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-02-17 6:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] add option for iso9660 filesystem image Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-01 21:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 1/2] modify bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image (grub) jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-03-01 21:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/2] add bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image (isolinux) jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-03-02 16:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 1/2] modify bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image (grub) Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-02 19:04 ` jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-03-02 21:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 1/2] adding bootloader option for iso9660 filesystem image jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
2014-03-02 21:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 2/2] add bootloader isolinux " jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E7E9E4.20400@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox