From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:14:09 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] full rebuild and errors In-Reply-To: <20140128230904.1f01a5dc@skate> References: <52E4FA8C.7060109@gmail.com> <52E6945C.40202@mind.be> <52E8120F.7080805@gmail.com> <20140128230904.1f01a5dc@skate> Message-ID: <52E8AA41.1020709@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 28/01/14 23:09, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Marco Trapanese, > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:24:47 +0100, Marco Trapanese wrote: > >> Yeah! It did the trick! >> I can't imagine it was a ccache problem because I deleted the whole >> directory and cloned again the repository from scratch - I thought it >> should reset anything to the initial state, my fault! > > No, it doesn't. The cache of ccache is located in > ~/.buildroot-ccache/, because the intent of ccache is precisely to be > able to re-use the cache contents across complete rebuilds, and even > across multiple clones of Buildroot. But this is yet another proof that it doesn't work very well. And this one really worries me, because it's a host build that failed. Marco, can you try to remember exactly what was different between the first and second build? Was it the same buildroot source, the same buildroot config, etc.? Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F