From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Lukichev <alexander.lukichev@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:26:20 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] infozip: fix cross-compilation issues
In-Reply-To: <87ob2pp8xa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
References: <1391120128-8375-1-git-send-email-romain.naour@openwide.fr>
 <CAAHaz6Gu=hK8VaLx8fBxZ6i1X533bPgU_Sp0gWzJO8LBpbRaSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ob2pp8xa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Message-ID: <52EF60BC.4040600@gmail.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hi Peter, Romain, all,

On 02/02/2014 10:16 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Lukichev <alexander.lukichev@gmail.com> writes:
>  >     +-CFLAGS = -O2 $(CFLAGS_NOOPT)
>  >     ++CFLAGS ?= -02 $(CFLAGS_NOOPT)
>  > Excuse me, is it -02 that's meant here?
> Good catch. Actually in the context of Buildroot we don't want the
> package to hardcode the optimization level, so I will simply drop it.

Just out of curiosity, I have not seen an -0<N> gcc optimization
flag (as opposed to -O<N>, zero vs. a big O). Is it somewhere on
gcc manual?

--
Best regards,
  Alexander Lukichev