From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-02-07
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:18:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F9CEC1.2030200@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210210752.641364a8@skate>
On 02/10/14 21:07, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
>
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:39:48 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
>>>> This one I agree is old. The question is: how do I exclude this package
>>>> from being built. Should we introduce hidden Config.in bools for kernel
>>>> header versions, so that the packages that need at least the kernel
>>>> headers from kernel X.Y are not visible if you have a too old
>>>> toolchain? Those bools would be set by linux-headers/Config.in for the
>>>> internal backend, automatically set for the well-known external
>>>> toolchains, and a custom choice for special external toolchains.
>>>
>>> I think we should indeed implement a mechanism to restrict packages
>>> based on kernel headers.
>>> There have been many packages that require recent kernel headers, and
>>> it is not feasible to fix all these packages individually. Forcing the
>>> user to update their kernel headers or toolchain is not unreasonable,
>>> and otherwise they are always welcome to propose a patch for a
>>> particular package, or discuss the matter upstream.
>>>
>>> The solution you propose seems a good idea to me and not too complex.
>>
>> I had also thought about this option already. However, I expect the "not
>> too complex" is not entirely true: you probably want symbols from
>> something like 2.6.36 up to 3.13... Hm, that's just 20 symbols, maybe not
>> so bad after all. However, for custom external toolchains and for custom
>> kernel headers, all of these have to be made visible as well, so that
>> adds another 20 symbols...
>
> True, but I don't really see another solution that solves the problem
> at hand...
Neither do I.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-08 7:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-02-07 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-08 12:49 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-10 8:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-10 10:27 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2014-02-10 17:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-02-10 20:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-11 7:18 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2014-02-10 17:31 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-10 17:44 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2014-02-10 17:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-10 17:55 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-10 17:51 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-10 17:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F9CEC1.2030200@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox