From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Makefile.legacy: fix recursive invocation with BUILDROOT_DL_DIR and _CONFIG
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:01:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F9D8C7.7070900@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210220947.GG5239@free.fr>
On 02/10/14 23:09, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Arnout, All,
>
> On 2014-02-10 22:48 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) spake thusly:
>> The legacy support for the old BUILDROOT_DL_DIR and BUILDROOT_CONFIG
>> breaks down when make is invoked recursively - which is done in a few
>> cases, e.g. silentoldconfig, external-defs, ... These targets always
>> give a legacy error.
>>
>> For BUILDROOT_DL_DIR, this is fixed by making sure that the original
>> value of BR2_DL_DIR taken from the environment is also exported again.
>>
>> For BUILDROOT_CONFIG, this is fixed with an additional comparison of
>> the environment variable's value with the fake value that we introduce
>> ourselves.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
>
> I gave my Tested-by earlier (and I am *not* withdrawing it) since I
> think this is a valid stop-gap fix which should go before -rc1 is cut.
>
> However, I wonder how appropriate this implementation is. I am not really
> convinced by this hack (although I can't see a better alternative).
>
> Another solution (which I do not like much, either) would be to enclose
> these checks in:
>
> ifeq ($(ALREADY_IN_BUILDROOT),)
> blabla legacy stuff blabla
> endif
>
> and at the end of the main Makefile, add:
>
> export ALREADY_IN_BUILDROOT=y
>
> But, this is hacky too, and I'm not fond of it either.
Yeah, it's not really an improvement.
We could also just throw away those legacy checks.
Regards,
Arnout
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 21:48 [Buildroot] [PATCH] Makefile.legacy: fix recursive invocation with BUILDROOT_DL_DIR and _CONFIG Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-02-10 21:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-10 22:09 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-02-11 8:01 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2014-02-11 8:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F9D8C7.7070900@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox