From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:18:50 +0000
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] iso9660: Added support for overlay
	directories
In-Reply-To: <5301B4E9.60902@mind.be>
References: <1391549148-31993-1-git-send-email-martin@barkynet.com>
 <5301B4E9.60902@mind.be>
Message-ID: <5303A40A.1090704@barkynet.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net


On 17/02/14 07:06, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 04/02/14 22:25, Martin Bark wrote:
>> This patch adds a variable BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_OVERLAY that
>> is similar to BR2_ROOTFS_OVERLAY except the files are placed in the
>> iso9660 file system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com>
>
> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
>
>   I haven't tried it but it looks obviously-correct.
>
>   Jean Sergemoel has a patch in the queue that does a similar thing (in
> addition to a few more changes). Jean, could you rebase your patches on
> top of this one? And, if possible, also test if this one works for you.
> If yes, add your Tested-by to this patch.

Arnout,

Thanks for the review.  Yes by some strange coincidence both Jean and 
myself sent patches for the iso9660 file system on the same day.  I 
agree it would be best to rebase Jeans patches.


Jean,

Let me know if you want any assistance on producing an updated patch set.

Thanks