From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jean.sorgemoel at laposte.net Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:59:51 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] iso9660: Added support for overlay directories In-Reply-To: <530F805E.2090906@laposte.net> References: <1391549148-31993-1-git-send-email-martin@barkynet.com> <5301B4E9.60902@mind.be> <5303A40A.1090704@barkynet.com> <530F805E.2090906@laposte.net> Message-ID: <53124A47.1000503@laposte.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >> >> On 17/02/14 07:06, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >>> On 04/02/14 22:25, Martin Bark wrote: >>>> This patch adds a variable BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_OVERLAY that >>>> is similar to BR2_ROOTFS_OVERLAY except the files are placed in the >>>> iso9660 file system. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Bark >>> >>> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) >>> >>> I haven't tried it but it looks obviously-correct. >>> >>> Jean Sergemoel has a patch in the queue that does a similar thing (in >>> addition to a few more changes). Jean, could you rebase your patches on >>> top of this one? And, if possible, also test if this one works for you. >>> If yes, add your Tested-by to this patch. >> >> Arnout, >> >> Thanks for the review. Yes by some strange coincidence both Jean and >> myself sent patches for the iso9660 file system on the same day. I >> agree it would be best to rebase Jeans patches. >> >> >> Jean, >> >> Let me know if you want any assistance on producing an updated patch >> set. >> >> Thanks >> > > Hi All, > > Ok, I will include that in my patch. > > Regards, > Jean Hi All, I will send new patch to include your remark. I use my real name (Jerome Sagnole) :) Arnout, for your remark on default (option BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_ROCK_RIDGE) I keep this default for compatibility because this option is activate in old code. If you want I can suppress that. Regards, Jerome