From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgS8O8bW1lbA==?= Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:41:53 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] State of your Qt 5 patches In-Reply-To: <20140302123100.1b966bcd@skate> References: <20140302002857.2a9f166d@skate> <5313095B.7070204@gmx.net> <20140302123100.1b966bcd@skate> Message-ID: <53131901.3030006@gmx.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 02.03.2014 12:31, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Peter K?mmel, > > On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:35:07 +0100, Peter K?mmel wrote: > >>> Could you have a look at the following patches, and let me know which >>> ones no longer makes sense (because you have sent a new version) and >>> which ones still make sense: >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320476/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320475/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320472/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320462/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320407/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317465/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317462/ >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317461/ >> >> Hi Thomas, >> >> the patches where intended for 2014.02. > > And why wouldn't they be usable now? > >> Maybe we should simply drop them and wait for Qt 5.3, planned for 29th Apr 2014: >> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.3-release > > That doesn't seem like a good idea. April, 29th will be very close to > 2014.05-rc1, and so it might be too late to get the changes in. > > I would really like those Qt 5.2.1 changes to get it now. Can you tell > me which patches from the list above still make sense? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320476/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320475/ But I haven't tested them with current master, but I could check with master next week. BTW, what's the correct way to update a patch? Just sending to the list like a new one and to superseded on patchwork? Thanks, Peter > > Thanks! > > Thomas >