From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerzy Grzegorek Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:52:38 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/9] Documentation cleanup In-Reply-To: <20140329093317.29e80f16@skate> References: <1396041895-29533-1-git-send-email-jerzy.grzegorek@trzebnica.net> <20140329093317.29e80f16@skate> Message-ID: <533697E6.5000804@trzebnica.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, > Dear Jerzy Grzegorek, > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:24:41 +0100, Jerzy Grzegorek wrote: > >> Here is a series that fixes a few typoes and makes small improvements >> in documentation. > I've applied patches 1 to 6, 8 and 9. For patch 2, I made the change we > discussed. > > I haven't applied patch 7, because I don't agree with: > > +series is introduced by a cover letter, an overall patch version may be > +added to the cover letter in addition/instead to the individual commits. > > The version in the title of the cover letter does *not* replace the > version in the title of the patches. Both should be present, so the > "/instead" is not correct. Also, the "may be added" does not seem > right, because a version is always added to the cover letter title by > "git format-patch --subject-prefix". Regarding the "may be added", I agree. I proposed this change because I saw on mailing list both cases of submitting patch series introduced by a cover letter: * "in addition" case: [Patch vX 0/Y] ... [Patch vX 1/Y] ... ... [Patch vX Y/Y] ... * "instead" case: [Patch vX 0/Y] ... [Patch 1/Y] ... ... [Patch Y/Y] ... but ok, agree. So maybe it should be: "Note that when your patch series is introduced by a cover letter, a patch version should be added to the cover letter in addition to the individual commits." Regards, Jerzy > > Best regards, > > Thomas