From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:36:43 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: bump to version 2.19 SVN R25243 In-Reply-To: <20140407152919.2d1147fb@skate> References: <1396875879-22199-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20140407152919.2d1147fb@skate> Message-ID: <5342A9EB.1030801@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 04/07/2014 10:29 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > So we don't do like glibc where we support both 2.18 and 2.19 ? This is > really a question, maybe it makes sense to only support one version at > a time. In which case we could remove 2.18 from glibc. My opinion is that we should just keep it as simple as possible. If there's a special need for some architecture (like microblaze) let it be so, but really unless we know there's some issue or exception i don't think there's much value in keeping multiple versions, specially since *glibc is backwards ABI compatible. Regards.