From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cody P Schafer Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:25:48 -0700 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] package/gdb: add gdb 7.7.1 In-Reply-To: <20140512212131.4f83a517@free-electrons.com> References: <1399842673-21261-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1399842673-21261-2-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140511235400.67d6ac5f@free-electrons.com> <53711C15.5010909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140512212131.4f83a517@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5371203C.2000206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 05/12/2014 12:21 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Cody P Schafer, > > On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:08:05 -0700, Cody P Schafer wrote: > >>> I'm not sure we want to jump straight to 7.7 for all architectures. >>> We're usually a bit conservative with regard to the version of toolchain >>> components. So I'd suggest instead to add 7.6 and 7.7. Make 7.6 the new >>> default for all architectures except PPC64, and make 7.6 unavailable >>> for PPC64, and therefore select 7.7 for PPC64. Of course, all older gdb >>> versions should be unavailable for PPC64. >> >> So long as s/PPC64/PPC64le/, sure. > > Right. I guess PPC64 (big endian) has been supported since a long time, > is this correct? Yep, ppc64 (big endian) has been around and supported in gcc/glibc/gdb for quite a while now (looks like the first gdb support landed in 2007).