From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hadrien Boutteville <hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:57:37 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01
 if EABIhf is used
In-Reply-To: <20140610214610.03f16f6c@free-electrons.com>
References: <1402427667-26813-1-git-send-email-hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com>
 <20140610214610.03f16f6c@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <53976331.70801@gmail.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thomas,

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:46:10 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:14:27 +0200, Hadrien Boutteville wrote:
> 
>> +# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't
>> +# use it.
> 
> The wording is a bit confusing here: you say that "we downgrade to
> 5_01_00_01 if we can't use it", which to me doesn't make much sense, as
> we downgrade to something we can't use :-)

Erf, yes, in rereading this is actually not clear. I wanted to refer to
EABIhf with "it". I have to fix that.

>>  ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y)
>> +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01
>>  TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin
>>  else
>> +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01
>>  TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin
>>  endif
>>  
>> +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475
> 
> Is the TI_GFX_SO_VERSION the same between both versions of ti-gfx?

Yes.

Thanks,

Hadrien