From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:40:58 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
In-Reply-To: <CAB0FRsvxYB=UWssrJSThtVnC4Js6_tjrMOozhr-KPg_4eSw8JQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1403471757-19622-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
 <CAB0FRstxBpfBcoyojk3j_fPhJdaVfRz2gOZXWdiCGdBviF16TQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140623173544.GC3400@free.fr>
 <CAB0FRsvxYB=UWssrJSThtVnC4Js6_tjrMOozhr-KPg_4eSw8JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53A9AA1A.3030804@mind.be>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 23/06/14 19:50, Fran?ois Perrad wrote:
[snip]
> I prefer that we use Backpan only the package Mojolicious. The use of
> Backpan must stay unusual.

 Can you explain why it should stay unusual? Is Mojolicious the only package for
which the author removes old versions? If the general policy on CPAN is not to
remove old versions, then I agree with you, but otherwise I think backpan is a
better option.

 Regards,
 Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F