[Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 5 RFC] uclibc/busybox: fix handling of configuration file

[Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>]

On 29/06/14 10:20, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,
> 
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:13:28 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> 
>>> This sounds like a very interesting idea, I'll explore it further in
>>> the context of this patch series.
>>
>> I'm working on this now, but I wonder which is the right approach wrt
>> the organization of the patch series:
>>
>> - first line up linux, busybox, uclibc in the way they handle the
>> kconfig stuff, then extract this to a kconfig-package framework
>> - or first introduce a kconfig-package framework with the 'right'
>> handling, then convert each of linux, busybox, uclibc in subsequent
>> patches?
> 
> I'd say it doesn't matter that much. Maybe the first one allows more
> easily to see the functional changes that are made, by really I don't
> think it matter. At least on my end, I'd be happy with any of those two
> solutions.

 Same here. I had thought about it and found arguments for both options, so I
thought it better not to say anything :-)

 Regards,
 Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F