From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Bark Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:50:28 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ladspa-sdk: new package In-Reply-To: <20140804222345.65aacf17@free-electrons.com> References: <1398374384-8814-1-git-send-email-martin@barkynet.com> <20140804222345.65aacf17@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <53E14394.2030309@barkynet.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, On 04/08/14 21:23, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Martin Bark, > > Sorry for the lack of feedback until now on these patches. See below > for a number of comments. That's fine, to be honest I forgot I submitted these patches :) > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:19:42 +0100, Martin Bark wrote: >> LADSPA is a standard that allows software audio processors and >> effects to be plugged into a wide range of audio synthesis and >> recording packages. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Bark > > First, looking at LADSPA, it seems like there has been no releases > since 2007 or so. Is this still actively developed and used? Googling > around, I've seen mentions of a new thing called LV2 which would be a > LADSPA replacement. Originally I started this because I wanted an equaliser for some work i was doing with acoustic echo cancellation. alsaeqaul was a quick easy way to add a equaliser i could change real time. alsaequal needs caps which is an ladsp module hence the 3 patches. I don't know if ladsp is under active development. Really it's just the definition of an API in a C header file so I think it's not meant to change. It's the packages like caps which implement the interface which i expect to be active. caps is self contained (it includes a copy of ladsp.h) and does not need this ladsp-sdk package, i added it for completeness. Is the lack of development activity an issue? I could drop ladsp-sdk if you like. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks Martin