From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?R3VpbGxhdW1lIEdBUkRFVCAtIE9saXPDqW8=?= Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:52:19 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/squid: enable ICAP server support in squid and define logdir, pidfile and swapdir In-Reply-To: <54359D66.3000608@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1411032426-11463-1-git-send-email-guillaume.gardet@oliseo.fr> <1411032426-11463-2-git-send-email-guillaume.gardet@oliseo.fr> <20141005235232.66d3c09c@free-electrons.com> <5435988F.70209@oliseo.fr> <20141008221807.3b9e147d@free-electrons.com> <54359D66.3000608@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <543F9553.1000204@oliseo.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le 08/10/2014 22:24, Gustavo Zacarias a ?crit : > On 10/08/2014 05:18 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > >>> Without: 2.7 MB,and with c-icap: 3.0 MB >>> >>> Should I make it optionnal? >> I would tend to say yes. Making it optional not only saves space, but >> it also makes it explicit that our Squid build can support the ICAP >> client functionality. > I wouldn't mind keeping it as is, squid is a big RAM and storage > sinkhole so it's a no-go for memory-constrained targets in general, > after all it's a caching (in disk) proxy with the RAM usage for keeping > indexes at hand. > Regards. > > Then, should I make it optionnal or not? I think it should be ok to keep it included as it will never be used on underpowered SoC. Thomas, would you be ok with that? Guillaume