From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:01:54 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] Samba4 build issue In-Reply-To: <20141104082623.33a2136e@free-electrons.com> References: <20141101233957.7ca9aabd@free-electrons.com> <545577D9.1040405@zacarias.com.ar> <20141102103811.16e499df@free-electrons.com> <545628BF.2030101@zacarias.com.ar> <20141104082623.33a2136e@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5458DC52.6020706@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 11/04/2014 04:26 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Gustavo Zacarias, > > On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 09:51:11 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: >> On 11/02/2014 06:38 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> >>> Ok, so it's libcap causing issues. Have those issues reported upstream? >>> While reverting to an older version libcap being an acceptable >>> temporary workaround, it's not going to be nice on the long run; >> >> They're fixed, revised patch sent. >> Let's just hope it doesn't break other stuff. > > Great, thanks for having worked on this. D'oh! http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/992/9928a251e5cfcf6e574a447221e938135eeb69f9/build-end.log Seems the new libcap version requires 3.1+ kernel headers. I'm not a big fan of those ppc toolchains since they're old, but what's the linux headers baseline we're looking for? Mandatory use of libcap: cdrkit - ouch lxc - probably not that much squid - probably not that much systemd - irrelevant, needs newer headers by itself We could propagate the headers dep, it's just that it will look silly on cdrkit. Opinions? Regards.