From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:32:13 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] systemV init without busybox series In-Reply-To: <20141106182413.198106d0@free-electrons.com> References: <1415281013-1077-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20141106182413.198106d0@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <545BB09D.2080805@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 11/06/2014 02:24 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Have you seen "[PATCH] start-stop-daemon: new package" already > submitted by Karoly Kasza a few days ago? I didn't notice it before, just seen it, this series was made about two weeks ago. That's one way to do it, but it's a bit hackish. In my version of the package i download the dpkg tarball (downloads ain't expensive these days and it isn't some super big tarball either), configure stripping almost everything and just build/install start-stop-daemon, everything without any nasting patching. I didn't send it because i want feedback on naming, for all intents and purposes it's just a start-stop-daemon package even though it downloads the dpkg tarball. Dpkg tools can be built from what i've seen but the build time & footprint will be far bigger, and i think it will send a wrong message/expectations. Regards.