From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] samba: Add support for libnss_win*.so* installation
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:24:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54730753.3030108@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141122213359.2628a10e@free-electrons.com>
On 11/22/2014 05:33 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Gustavo,
>
> Could you have a look at the below patch? It would be useful to have
> some review from a person knowing Samba better than I do.
Hi, let's see.
> I must say I'm a bit skeptical about two things (about which probably
> Beno?t can give some details) :
>
> * The usefulness of enabling the NSS libraries in non-glibc
> environments. Even though I agree that technically, nothing prevents
> some program from using them, in practice, the NSS libraries are
> basically only used by the glibc name resolution logic. So I would
> personally prefer to make those NSS libraries visible only in glibc
> configurations.
Even if they can be built they really are intended for (e)glibc so we agree.
If you need to access/use wbclient functionality you could just use the
wbclient (winbind) api by enabling samba install to staging, that's the
public way of accessing it.
> * The fact that the winbindd daemon is not actually needed on the
> target to get libnss_wins/libnss_winbind working. My understanding
> is that winbindd is a daemon that will answer to the name resolution
> requests of libnss_wins/libnss_winbind, so I don't see how they can
> work without the daemon running.
AFAIK you need winbind running in order to use libwbclient and/or
libnss_winbind/wins. I think libnss_wins has a fallback to DNS-only mode
but it's probably not very useful.
Also please note that Samba 3 is very likely going EOL as soon as Samba
4.2.x is released which even though delayed a bit in the RC phase is
coming along pretty soon, so adding feature to the samba3 package isn't
very wise IMHO (it's in security-only fixes now).
See: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-24 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 18:14 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] samba: Remove execution rights from smb.conf Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-08-04 18:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] samba: Add support for libnss_win*.so* installation Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-08-04 18:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-04 18:37 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-11-22 20:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-24 10:24 ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2014-11-24 19:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-24 21:05 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-11-24 21:09 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2014-08-04 18:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] samba: Remove execution rights from smb.conf Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54730753.3030108@zacarias.com.ar \
--to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox