From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:51:43 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH branch/next] pinentry: bump version to 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: <20141208171919.14471823@free-electrons.com> References: <1417190979-53042-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20141208102220.7a8242d2@free-electrons.com> <548577F0.5020700@imgtec.com> <5485C831.4090205@imgtec.com> <20141208165219.313b9967@free-electrons.com> <5485CD80.2080705@imgtec.com> <20141208171919.14471823@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5485D71F.8080708@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas Petazzoni, On 12/08/2014 04:19 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:10:40 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > >> I can send a patch to pinentry to make the accessibility part optional. >> Do you prefer I mark my current patch as rejected and do another one >> including the patch for making the accessibility part optional instead >> of modifying packages/qt/qt.mk? > > I was suggesting to make the accessibility feature in Qt optional, and > then have the pinentry package select this option in Qt. Well..., that's another valid option, yes, but I prefer to fix pinentry upstream and leave the qt package as is. I have sent a patch for that: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2014-December/029182.html Let's see if it gets merged soon and we can backport it. Cheers, -- Vicente Olivert Riera Graduate Software Engineer, MIPS Platforms Imagination Technologies Limited t: +44 (0)113 2429814 www.imgtec.com