From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:33:58 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/7] rsyslog: rename sysv initscript to S01logging In-Reply-To: <20150114203051.513c370c@free-electrons.com> References: <1421191022-5509-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <1421191022-5509-3-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20150114203051.513c370c@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <54B6C4A6.6010204@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 01/14/2015 04:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > To be honest, I wasn't really sure whether the right approach to handle > this issue was to rename the init script as you did, or to have rsyslog > explicitly remove S01logging when Busybox is enabled. > > Since the rest of patch series was doing some cleanup on the renamed > S01logging, I decided to take your approach, but I must say I wasn't > entirely sure on how to handle this. > > Comments from others are welcome, I don't consider the proposed > solution to be set in stone. It's the best deterministic option we've got, rsyslog builds after busybox (famous dependency trickery) but then again there's no clear winner with sysklogd (the default shell dilemma). We could throw an option for logger, but i think that would be crowding things a little. I'm not opposed to it or other solutions though. Regards.