From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:19:31 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] python-jinja2: allow build as host-package In-Reply-To: <20150127221431.14835106@free-electrons.com> References: <1422293158-26124-1-git-send-email-erico.nunes@datacom.ind.br> <1422293158-26124-2-git-send-email-erico.nunes@datacom.ind.br> <54C7FE07.4030206@mind.be> <20150127221431.14835106@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <54C800E3.8020907@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 27/01/15 22:14, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:07:19 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >>> While currently there are no in-tree Buildroot packages which depend on >>> host-python-jinja2, I'm currently having to deal with a proprietary >>> software build system that requires it. >> >> Forgot to mention in my last review: in that case, you should also add a >> Config.in.host for it (and update package/Config.in.host). > > Why ? If it's merely used as a build dependency of another package, I > don't see why we should have a menuconfig entry for it. Indeed, having > a host-python-ninja2 package with no users in-tree is weird, but I > don't think cluttering the "Host utilities" menu with such packages is > the appropriate solution here. Hm I guess you're right. So Erico, forget I mentioned it. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F