From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ezequiel Garcia Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:47:55 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] arm: update processor types In-Reply-To: <54CFA343.9090806@openwide.fr> References: <1421951608-31233-1-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <1421951608-31233-3-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <54CFA343.9090806@openwide.fr> Message-ID: <54D66BEB.6030002@vanguardiasur.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Romain, First of all, thanks for the great feedback. On 02/02/2015 01:18 PM, Romain Naour wrote: [..] >> - default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT if BR2_m68k >> + default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT if BR2_m68k || BR2_cortex_m3 > > What do you think about adding BR2_ARCH_HAS_EFL_SUPPORT in each architecture > Config.in.x instead of black-listing them here ? > I've been thinking about this. At first it seemed like a good idea, but then I realised that Cortex-M3 is not really an architecture, but a variant. Introducing BR2_ARCH_HAS_ELF_SUPPORT would mean selecting it on almost each architecture and almost each of the ARM variants, except Cortex-M3. So, it seems like it would be an elegant way of doing this, but I'm not sure it's worth such an invasive change. -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar