From: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] arm: update processor types
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:43:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DF5F14.2010900@openwide.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D66BEB.6030002@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Hi Ezequiel,
Le 07/02/2015 20:47, Ezequiel Garcia a ?crit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> First of all, thanks for the great feedback.
You're welcome :)
>
> On 02/02/2015 01:18 PM, Romain Naour wrote:
> [..]
>>> - default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT if BR2_m68k
>>> + default BR2_BINFMT_FLAT if BR2_m68k || BR2_cortex_m3
>>
>> What do you think about adding BR2_ARCH_HAS_EFL_SUPPORT in each architecture
>> Config.in.x instead of black-listing them here ?
>>
>
> I've been thinking about this. At first it seemed like a good idea, but
> then I realised that Cortex-M3 is not really an architecture, but
> a variant.
>
> Introducing BR2_ARCH_HAS_ELF_SUPPORT would mean selecting it on almost each
> architecture and almost each of the ARM variants, except Cortex-M3.
>
> So, it seems like it would be an elegant way of doing this, but I'm not sure
> it's worth such an invasive change.
>
We may introduce BR2_ARCH_HAS_ELF_SUPPORT as an hidden option which is set to y
by default except for BR2_bfin, BR2_m68k and BR2_cortex_m3. (like for BR2_USE_MMU)
config BR2_ARCH_HAS_ELF_SUPPORT
bool
default y if !(BR2_bfin || BR2_m68k || BR2_cortex_m3)
What other developer think ?
Best regards,
Romain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-14 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 18:33 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] ARM Cortex-M3 support Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-22 18:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] arm: conditionally support regular ARM instructions Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-02 16:17 ` Romain Naour
2015-02-02 20:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-22 18:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] arm: update processor types Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-02 16:18 ` Romain Naour
2015-02-07 18:05 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-14 13:51 ` Romain Naour
2015-02-07 19:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-14 14:43 ` Romain Naour [this message]
2015-01-22 18:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] toolchain: allow for stupid toolchains Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-25 19:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-02-02 16:18 ` Romain Naour
2015-02-02 17:32 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-01-22 18:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] toolchain-external: add OSELAS 2013.12.2 Cortex-M3 toolchain Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-02 16:29 ` Romain Naour
2015-02-02 20:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] ARM Cortex-M3 support Thomas Petazzoni
2015-02-03 1:05 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54DF5F14.2010900@openwide.fr \
--to=romain.naour@openwide.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox