From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 16:05:17 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH V2 1/2] tcl: add support for static builds In-Reply-To: <20150307155634.605f5a68@free-electrons.com> References: <1425734562-5312-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20150307144233.5ee1db01@free-electrons.com> <54FB0B22.8050604@imgtec.com> <20150307155634.605f5a68@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <54FB13AD.5080008@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas Petazzoni, On 07/03/15 15:56, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, > > On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:28:50 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > >> I guess you could need tcl to build something that depends on it, and >> link against libtcl8.6.a, for instance. > > If you need tcl to build something, then it's the host tcl, not the > target tcl. uhm..., I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean. If you have a package that depends on tcl (it links against libtcl8.6.a, for instance), then you will need the target tcl (actually the staging one), which has the right architecture for your target, no? The host tcl would have the same architecture as the host machine which may not be the same as the target one. Am I missing anything? Regards, -- Vincent > Thomas >