From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:44:12 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] RFC: systemd and service files cleanup In-Reply-To: References: <1426787807-29510-1-git-send-email-mike@mikebwilliams.com> Message-ID: <550B432C.9060100@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 19/03/15 20:50, Steven Noonan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Mike Williams wrote: >>> I come from the Arch Linux world, so I made a new skeleton that >>> matches the Arch base filesystem layout: with /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, >>> and /usr/sbin all unified (likewise with /lib and /usr/lib). I haven't >>> convinced myself to post the series because I can't think of a >>> particularly good justification for it in the Buildroot context. >> >> I'm working that way myself, I don't know what use cases in Buildroot >> still require the split. > > We could consider offering it as an experimental alternative to the > default skeleton (just add another "choice" in kconfig, as I did in my > patch series). And open a discussion about unifying the directory > structure. It's certainly possible to support both use cases, though > it does require more testing. I've also started using a unified /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin and unified /lib /usr/lib /lib64 /usr/lib64, and it really simplifies things a lot. I yet have to find a disadvantage. Make it it a choice sounds like a great idea! Please Cc me on the patch :-) Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F