[Buildroot] [PATCH] strongswan: needs atomics

[Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>]

On 04/08/2015 06:22 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Thanks for the summary.
> 
> How do you handle Blackfin, which uses gcc 4.3, while I believe
> libatomic is a new thing in gcc 4.8, no?
> 
> Are you sure all atomic intrinsics are tied to the existence of
> libatomic? It's quite hard to find some good documentation on the web
> about libatomic.

Experimental evidence says that if it's hardware supported you don't
need libatomic, for the rest you do.
The problem is some bits may be, others may not.
Example: i386, mips, mipsel, they do the up-to-32-bits stuff but need
libatomic for 64+ bits.
Regards.