From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:13:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] sh64: drop support for architecture In-Reply-To: <20150409192212.GB27057@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <20150407203101.GA14853@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <20150408225336.0b046dac@free-electrons.com> <20150409192212.GB27057@waldemar-brodkorb.de> Message-ID: <55283CE6.2080707@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 09/04/15 21:22, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi Thomas, > Thomas Petazzoni wrote, > >> Dear Waldemar Brodkorb, >> >> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:31:01 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: >>> There seems to be no hardware or emulator available for this >>> architecture. Someone from ST Microelectronics told me that >>> sh64/sh5 projects are dropped over ten years ago. >>> I found nothing about real hardware on the sites of Hitachi >>> or Renesas. >>> We should drop this. >>> Support in uClibc-ng will be dropped in 1.1. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb >> >> Following my and Peter comments, we'd prefer to see this feature to be >> marked as deprecated. I've marked the patch as "Rejected" in patchwork. >> Can you cook a patch simply marking sh64 as deprecated? > > Is there documentation how to do this? Just add depends on BR2_DEPRECATED_SINCE_2015_05 (check 'git log -p --grep deprecate' for examples) Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F