From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:28:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v2 0/5] common service startup files In-Reply-To: <20150422220234.GA11809@vostro> References: <20150422231143.2b2921e2@free-electrons.com> <20150422220234.GA11809@vostro> Message-ID: <55382071.2000601@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 04/23/15 00:02, Alex Suykov wrote: > Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:11:43PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > >> Thanks for this proposal. However, as you have seen, the general >> feedback was not very positive. We don't really like having a >> specialized language being created for Buildroot, so the overall >> approach doesn't really match the "spirit" of how things are done in >> Buildroot. >> >> I've marked the corresponding patches as rejected in our patch tracking >> system. > > Ok, yeah, the initial reaction was pretty clear and I thought it has been > marked as rejected for several weeks already. Looks like it wasn't, > so people got those patch reminders and started replying. > > -*-- > > And a kind of follow-up: I've got a bunch of systemd service files > as a by-product of this effort, some of them for packages that > have no systemd hooks at present. > > If you're interested, I could either upload them somewhere > for you to pick up, or alternatively start sending patches myself. > One package at a time, without any global infrastructure changes. That would be great! Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F