Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Naumann <dev@andin.de>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] Makefile: add target to clean targetfs
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:28:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553DF343.8010400@andin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430095555-8484-1-git-send-email-emeric.vigier@savoirfairelinux.com>



Am 27.04.2015 um 02:45 schrieb Emeric Vigier:
> If you had some files added to the targetfs (fs-overlay, new packages,
> ...) and you no longer need them, buildroot does not offer a simple way
> to remove these items from the output/target directory. The rule added
> by this commit allows you to clean the targetfs. Issuing 'make'
> afterward will generate a new and clean targetfs.
>
> A section in the documentation is also added. It describes few examples
> when developers could need it. 'make help' is also updated accordingly.
> And full-rebuild section of the documentation is updated with content
> and links.
>

Hi Emeric,

this is very helpful, in fact i have a similar patch running for quite 
some time where I remove target/ and images/ and the corresponding 
stamps. There are some problems though and I want to share my findings 
with you.
To begin with i was not 100% sure if the recreated target is the same as 
after a clean build. So I wrote a small check script which compares the 
original with the re-installed target trees. Here's the comparison i do:

   rsync -rvncl --delete --exclude '*.pyc' --exclude '*.pyo' --exclude 
'tmp/ldconfig/aux-cache' output/target/ target.orig/

As you see it already has some files excluded that are always recreated 
differently.
In addition I need to delete .stamp_host_installed from host-gcc-final* 
to force reinstall of libstdc++ into target (using external linaro 
toolchain).

Another problem that showed up was that some of the package install 
steps dont seem separated very well. E.g. qt5 examples copies everything 
from a certain staging-dir/* to target/..
A later qt5 module also creates files in that staging-dir, so next round 
there's more files in target.

I realize this is due to my way of not deleteing the staging dir any 
longer - I used to in the beginning. If I recall correctly this is 
because I noticed some packages copy files into staging/ during compile 
and these files are then missing after a reinstall. I'm not entirely 
sure though.

So my question is, in your approach, are you certain the re-installed 
staging/ is the same as the original for all packages? Maybe you can run 
some comparison like my rsync line for staging as well.


regards,
Andreas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-27  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-10  0:25 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: add target to clean targetfs Emeric Vigier
2015-03-10  4:45 ` Baruch Siach
2015-03-10 14:56   ` Emeric Vigier
2015-03-10 15:17     ` Baruch Siach
2015-03-10 19:28 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 " Emeric Vigier
2015-03-10 23:41   ` Ryan Barnett
2015-03-11  5:06     ` Baruch Siach
2015-03-11  8:22       ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-11  8:58         ` Baruch Siach
2015-03-12  8:32           ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-12 14:56             ` Emeric Vigier
2015-03-12 14:44     ` Emeric Vigier
2015-03-12 14:46       ` Ryan Barnett
2015-03-12  8:36   ` Angelo Compagnucci
2015-03-12 15:59   ` Jérôme Oufella
2015-04-27  0:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 " Emeric Vigier
2015-04-27  4:11   ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-28 14:36     ` Emeric Vigier
2015-04-27  8:28   ` Andreas Naumann [this message]
2015-04-28 15:06     ` Emeric Vigier
2015-07-14 21:56     ` Emeric Vigier
2015-07-16 15:15       ` Emeric Vigier
2015-07-23 20:51         ` Andreas Naumann
2015-10-04 16:56   ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553DF343.8010400@andin.de \
    --to=dev@andin.de \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox