From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 0/8] toolchain: better handle hashes (branch yem/dl-hash-toolchains)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:17:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553FDCC3.2090607@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150425142634.516e800e@free-electrons.com>
On 04/25/15 14:26, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> One thing that bothered me a little bit is that when the hash of the
> tarball downloaded from upstream doesn't match the one we have in BR,
> we gracefully fall back on downloading the tarball from
> sources.buildroot.net.
>
> This is good for users as it means their build succeeds. But not so
> good from the point of view of noticing that upstream has for some
> reason changed the tarball.
We could disable the SECONDARY site in the autobuilders.
Regards,
Arnout
>
> Any opinion about this?
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 22:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 0/8] toolchain: better handle hashes (branch yem/dl-hash-toolchains) Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 1/8] package/gcc: add hashes Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:36 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 2/8] package/binutils: " Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:37 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 3/8] package/uclibc: add missing hash for eXtensa Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:38 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 4/8] uclibc: update hash for arc Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:48 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 5/8] support/download: add possibility to not fail on missing hash Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:44 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 6/8] toolchain/external: ignore missing hash for custom downloaded toolchain Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:43 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 7/8] package/uclibc: ignore missing hash for snapshots Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:43 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-22 22:08 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 8/8] support/download: restore mandatory check of hashes Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-23 5:44 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-04-25 12:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 0/8] toolchain: better handle hashes (branch yem/dl-hash-toolchains) Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-28 19:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553FDCC3.2090607@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox