From: Floris Bos <bos@je-eigen-domein.nl>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/5] kconfig-package: add support for config fragments
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 13:30:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5544B545.6060809@je-eigen-domein.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5544A8D0.5080009@mind.be>
On 05/02/2015 12:37 PM, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 28/04/15 16:34, Floris Bos wrote:
>> Adds functionality to the kconfig infrastructure to merge additional
>> configuration fragment files to the main configuration file of
>> kconfig packages, using support/kconfig/merge_config.sh
>>
>> Typical use-case is when you want your configuration to be
>> kept in sync with an upstream (def)config file, but do require
>> some minor local modifications.
>>
>> Disables -update-config and -update-defconfig targets when
>> fragment files are set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Floris Bos <bos@je-eigen-domein.nl>
> [snip]
>
>> +* +FOO_KCONFIG_FRAGMENT_FILES+: a space-separated list of configuration
>> + fragment files that are merged to the main configuration file.
>> + Fragment files are typically used when there is a desire to stay in sync
>> + with an upstream (def)config file, with some minor modifications.
> I should have noticed this in the first iteration, but why do we need an
> additional config option for this? We could just rename _KCONFIG_FILE to
> _KCONFIG_FILES and update the help texts to explain that the files may consist
> of fragments.
Has been briefly discussed during the first iteration.
Main problem is _KCONFIG_FILE is not just a source file, but also a
destination file for the update-config and update-defconfig targets.
--
Yours sincerely,
Floris Bos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-02 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:34 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/5] kconfig-package: add support for config fragments Floris Bos
2015-04-28 14:34 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/5] linux: add option to specify " Floris Bos
2015-05-02 10:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-05-02 12:44 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-05-06 4:16 ` Gergely Imreh
2015-04-28 14:34 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 3/5] busybox: " Floris Bos
2015-05-02 12:47 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-28 14:34 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 4/5] uclibc: " Floris Bos
2015-05-02 12:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-28 14:34 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 5/5] barebox: " Floris Bos
2015-05-02 12:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-05-02 10:37 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/5] kconfig-package: add support for " Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-05-02 11:30 ` Floris Bos [this message]
2015-05-02 12:43 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-05-06 4:14 ` Gergely Imreh
2015-05-21 21:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5544B545.6060809@je-eigen-domein.nl \
--to=bos@je-eigen-domein.nl \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox