From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Romain Naour Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:40:02 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] package/harfbuzz: disable test programs In-Reply-To: <20150518230346.4c8a9a45@free-electrons.com> References: <1431467484-14459-1-git-send-email-romain.naour@openwide.fr> <20150518230346.4c8a9a45@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <555A5C32.1030209@openwide.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, Le 18/05/2015 23:03, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : > Dear Romain Naour, > > On Tue, 12 May 2015 23:51:23 +0200, Romain Naour wrote: >> Workaround a build issue by disabling all test >> binaries since it forget to link with -lstd++. >> >> Add a new configure option to disable test programs >> in a upstreamable way. >> >> Fixes: >> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/210/2107f9dfb39eeb6559fb4271c7af8b39aef521ca/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Romain Naour > > I was almost going to apply this one, but I'm not entirely happy in > fact. I really works around the real problem, and does not fix it: > imagine a real program now links statically to harfbuzz using harfbuzz > pkg-config file. This pkg-config file does not advertise the dependency > on libstdc++ in its Libs.private, so the link would also fail, just > like it currently fails for the test programs. -lstdc++ is only needed by libharfbuzz-icu.la which use the icu package. So maybe -lstdc++ is missing in Libs.private from icu-uc.pc ? > > Unfortunately, fixing the .pc file would not fix the internal harfbuzz > test programs, since they don't use pkg-config to get the link flags. > > To be honest, I am not sure what is the correct automake way of fixing > this problem. Maybe: > > -LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libharfbuzz.la $(GLIB_LIBS) > +LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libharfbuzz.la $(GLIB_LIBS) -lstdc++ > > in test/api/Makefile.am ? You would said ;) test_unicode_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/libharfbuzz-icu.la -lstdc++ With that fixed, Harbuzz build fine. Thanks for the review. Best regards, Romain > > Best regards, > > Thomas >