From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] CMake and VERBOSE variable
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5578B394.1010503@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9943347198fceae1227501e1d00f818a@openmailbox.org>
On 06/09/15 09:54, C?dric Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CMake turns on verbose mode if VERBOSE environment variable is defined
> and not empty. VERBOSE=0, VERBOSE=1, VERBOSE=whatever all enable
> verbose mode.
> See for example: http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=3378
>
> If VERBOSE is defined but empty, a "light" verbose mode is enabled. It
> consists in printing this information every time xxx.c file needs to be
> recompiled:
> Dependee "xxx.c" is newer than depender "xxx.c.o".
>
> NB: I am aware that these light verbose messages don't appear at first
> build. It is only disturbing when rebuilding packages when a source
> file is modified.
>
> This light verbose mode is enabled in Buildroot, and I suppose this is
> not deliberate. This is caused by VERBOSE being exported in root
> Makefile (line 231), even if not set:
> export SHELL CONFIG_SHELL quiet Q KBUILD_VERBOSE VERBOSE
The reason to export is, is to pass it to sub-makes that make use of the same
mechanism, e.g. the kernel.
However, there's something to be said for exporting it only if V=1.
>
> NB: All other variables in that list seems to always be not empty.
>
> There is another environment variable, CMAKE_NO_VERBOSE, that can be
> set (=1) to disable these "dependee" messages, even if VERBOSE is
> defined and empty.
> It does not disable the full verbose mode. VERBOSE=1 can still be used,
> but the "dependee" messages will not be showned in this full (not so
> full...) verbose mode.
>
> To disable this unexpected light verbose mode, the first solution could
> consist in adding CMAKE_NO_VERBOSE=1 in $(2)_MAKE_ENV in pkg-cmake.mk.
>
> This would make the fix specific to CMake, which makes sense for a CMake
> specific problem :)
The thing is, the working of CMAKE_NO_VERBOSE is not intuitive either (because
it can still be combined with VERBOSE=1).
So I'm more in favour of not exporting VERBOSE if empty.
Regards,
Arnout
>
> In fact I have not really made up my mind whether the "real" problem is
> in CMake or in Buildroot. On the one hand, CMake behaviour is strange
> (checking an empty variable), and on the other hand, Buildroot should
> not export this variable, even if this is not supposed to be harmful.
>
> In the end, I think the right solution would be not to export VERBOSE
> if not set (remove it from the export list, and export it when
> defined).
>
> What do you think about it? The fact that it is defined empty does not
> seem to be useful anywhere, but I might have missed something...
>
> Regards,
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 7:54 [Buildroot] CMake and VERBOSE variable Cédric Marie
2015-06-10 22:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2015-06-11 7:37 ` Cédric Marie
2015-06-11 20:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-18 8:29 ` Cédric Marie
2015-06-21 19:23 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-06-22 9:47 ` Cédric Marie
2015-06-22 10:50 ` Samuel Martin
2015-06-22 11:26 ` Cédric Marie
2015-06-22 11:57 ` Samuel Martin
2015-06-22 14:22 ` Cédric Marie
2015-08-20 13:04 ` Cédric Marie
2015-08-22 23:10 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-08-30 20:27 ` Cédric Marie
2015-08-31 7:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-31 12:35 ` Cédric Marie
2015-08-31 22:34 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-09-05 21:18 ` Cédric Marie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5578B394.1010503@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox