From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:34:51 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] openssl: support building the binary without MMU In-Reply-To: <20150621064540.534ebebc@free-electrons.com> References: <1434711274-49716-1-git-send-email-benoit@wsystem.com> <20150621064540.534ebebc@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5586AF6B.6020304@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 06/21/15 06:45, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Beno?t Th?baudeau, > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:54:33 +0200, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: >> The commit 720893b62510438237b9923d744dd079ddb4f67d "openssl: disable >> apps for NOMMU" prevented the openssl binary from being built without >> MMU in order to fix a build failure without fork(). However, openssl is >> designed to support the lack of fork() with -DHAVE_FORK=0, so allow the >> openssl binary to be enabled without MMU thanks to this option. >> >> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau > > Hum. But then it means that we have propagated the MMU dependency to > all reverse dependencies of openssl (i.e packages that depend on > openssl), but they may no longer need this dependency anymore. This is only about BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL_BIN, which is not selected by any package. Regards, Arnout > > There is a fairly huge list of packages that "select > BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL". How can we find out which ones will now build > fine without MMU support ? > > By the way, do you have a specific need for openssl on no-MMU > platforms? If so, on which platform? We don't have many no-MMU users, > so it's good when they speak up :-) > > Thanks, > > Thomas > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F