From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:54:57 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] board: add support for Warpboard In-Reply-To: <20150626150643.GB17113@free.fr> References: <1434988018-16391-1-git-send-email-lambertarthur22@gmail.com> <558B254C.2090606@mind.be> <20150625085428.GA3400@arthur-dreem> <558C800F.5030702@mind.be> <20150625223823.GI4178@free.fr> <20150626150643.GB17113@free.fr> Message-ID: <558DCA31.7000204@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 06/26/15 17:06, Yann E. MORIN wrote: [snip] > Again, I'm *not* against adding demo defconfig files, I am OK with that. > What I'd like is we keep basic defconfig files for all boards, and that > a demo defconfig should be a second defconfig, not replacement for a > basic defconfig file. > > (Ditto the Linux defconfig file, btw...) Actually for the Linux defconfig I don't agree. If you'd apply it there, the basic linux defconfig would include just the serial driver, so no USB, no networking, no framebuffer... I don't think that would make anyone happy, because it can be pretty tricky (even for someone experienced) to find out exactly what to enable. Therefore, for the Linux configs, I tend to prefer one which has all the devices enabled that are available on the board. And of course an in-tree defconfig is even better, and that usually has a lot of stuff that doesn't even exist on the board (e.g. because it supports multiple boards). Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF