From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:50:24 -0300
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: bump 2.25.x series to 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <20150722164819.2b9474e8@free-electrons.com>
References: <1437573697-12191-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <20150722164819.2b9474e8@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <55AFADB0.3060101@zacarias.com.ar>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 22/07/15 11:48, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> I know we haven't been doing this so far, but should we name the option
> 2_25_X like we do for gcc, and therefore avoid renaming the option for
> every minor release ? Or keep it named 2_25 even if the version is
> 2.25.1, I don't really care.

Same dilemma here, though i preferred to skip the rename in the bump.
I can send a follow up patch to do the renaming, it seems fit to match 
gcc i suppose.
Regards.