From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:07:57 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] system: add options for /bin /sbin and /lib to be symlinks into /usr In-Reply-To: <20150902160446.7fbf9ef6@free-electrons.com> References: <1441148113-4894-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20150902091051.7ee82cf3@free-electrons.com> <20150902160446.7fbf9ef6@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <55E702BD.5090608@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas Petazzoni, On 09/02/2015 03:04 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Mike Williams, > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:50:34 -0400, Mike Williams wrote: > >> It's not just what systemd expects, many packages by default install their >> systemd-related items to /lib, etc. instead of /usr/lib, so we either have >> manual fixes to the .mk files for those packages or inconsistencies in >> where those items go. As an example, I believe rsyslog is passed a special >> flag setting its systemd install location to /usr/lib, and gpsd is still >> just installing to /lib/systemd/system. >> >> It wouldn't surprise me if most of our systemd users had already merged >> their directories in their skeleton; I will probably do so soon as well. > > Hum, right, I see. Then maybe Yann's patch is the right answer. In fact > what I'd like to see in Buildroot is a group of people taking care of > the systemd-related issues. So if you're willing (with others) to > tackle that, it would be very useful. If you agree with Yann's patch, > can you please test it and give your formal Tested-by/Reviewed-by? > > Thanks, > > Thomas > and what about also selecting BR2_ROOTFS_USR_SYMLINKS in systemd's Config.in? Regards, Vincent.