[Buildroot] [PATCH] check: new package

[Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo.zacarias@free-electrons.com>]

On 07/09/15 16:27, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

>> Some people may use checkmk which is a host tool, which i remove for the target
>> (probably needs full gawk instead of busybox awk, and not very useful in the
>> target IMO).
>
>   I fully agree on removing checkmk on the target. I can also see that you'd want
> it on the host, but the user has no way to select it since there is no
> Config.in.host... So the user would have to do an explicit 'make host-check' to
> get it. It also won't be tested in the autobuilders.
>
>   So in principle, we only have host packages that are dependencies of other
> packages or that have a Config.in.host entry. An exception is when there is
> another package that uses it but that has not yet been accepted. Probably the
> reverse also exists: a host dependency that is no longer needed but the host
> package still exists.
>
>   Thomas recently proposed to violate this principle in the context of the
> python-colorama package [1], to which I replied no [2]. But of course that's
> still open for discussion.

Hi Arnout.
I don't have any particular use for the host variant, so no plan on 
arguing too much for it.
I'll spin v2 unless someone objects the other way around with a valid 
argument.
Regards.