From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:26:26 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 0/6] mdev-only /dev management (without devtmpfs) In-Reply-To: <1441747734-18730-1-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> References: <1441747734-18730-1-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <55EFFB42.2050106@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 08-09-15 23:28, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > There is one rough edge that I'd like to have comments about: variable > naming. The new method implemented by this patchset is dynamic and uses > mdev, so it should ba named BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_CREATION_DYNAMIC_MDEV and > described in kconfig as "dynamic using mdev". But hey, that name and > description are already used for the current "devtmpfs + mdev" method! So > we might want to rename all variables to encompass the new use case in a > clean way. Thid would also imply lagacy management etc. Since we don't like legacy management :-) I'd propose to say that DYNAMIC actually means DEVTMPFS. So the new option would be called BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_CREATION_MDEV: it's not devtmpfs, and there's no need for the explicit 'only' part. What do you think? Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF