From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:32:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 3/6] system: add mdev-only /dev management (without devtmpfs) In-Reply-To: <55F02630.5050500@lucaceresoli.net> References: <1441747734-18730-1-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> <1441747734-18730-4-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> <55EFF9FF.1020402@mind.be> <55F02630.5050500@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <55F026CA.9070804@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 09-09-15 14:29, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > But ehen, if any user has an S05something that uses /dev, it would > break. In order to reduce the risk to nearly zero, we might move > S10mdev to S00mdev, so it runs (most likely) as the first script. > > This would slightly change the current behaviour for all cases, and > start S01logging after mdev, not before. I tested it quickly and it > looks like it works. Can you think of any problem with moving S10mdev > to S00mdev? I'd prefer to have logging before mdev, so any fallout from mdev will appear in the logs. So for me, S02mdev is fine. In my mdev-using projects I usually have a custom mdev script (to do more extensive coldplugging) and I also move it to S02. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout dot vandecappelle at essensium dot com Senior Embedded Software Architect . . . . . . +32-478-010353 (mobile) Essensium, Mind division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium . . . . . BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF