From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:22:53 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v12 1/1] squeezelite: new package
In-Reply-To: <560557BB.6080800@imgtec.com>
References: <201509250304.t8P343dO012199@ms-omx03.plus.so-net.ne.jp>
 <5605101A.3090102@imgtec.com> <20150925161420.05e33e90@free-electrons.com>
 <560557BB.6080800@imgtec.com>
Message-ID: <560558BD.1030905@imgtec.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hi everyone,

On 09/25/2015 03:18 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On 09/25/2015 03:14 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:12:58 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> squeezelite v1.8 Downloading
>>>>> Doing shallow clone
>>>>> Initialized empty Git repository in
>>>>> /br/output/build/.squeezelite-v1.8.tar.gz.pb3XtQ/squeezelite-v1.8/
>>>>> remote: Counting objects: 82, done.
>>>>> Unpacking objects: 100% (82/82), done.
>>>>> warning: Remote branch v1.8 not found in upstream origin, using HEAD instead
>>>>> fatal: unable to read tree 668edec073bef579bedf43817f65aee3a592d0ef
>>>> Hmm...
>>>> I have been working on my cached source, so I did not realize it.
>>>> Yes, I can reproduce your problem with real clean buildroot tree.
>>>> Maybe something changed https://code.google.com/p/squeezelite repo
>>>> since my last fetch.
>>>> I'm considering to change SQUEEZELITE_SITE to github repo like:
>>>> https://github.com/sixeyed/squeezelite
>>>> Does this repo work for you too ?
>>>
>>> the fact that it works or not is not the problem. The problem is that
>>> right now there isn't any official repository for that project, so that
>>> repository could disappear tomorrow. And I don't know if the owner of
>>> that repository has made any change to the source code or not.
>>>
>>> Perhaps downloading the tarballs from Google Code and putting them in
>>> mirror.buildroot.org would be the best option. I have added Peter and
>>> Thomas on CC so they can tell their opinion about this issue.
>>
>> What do you want to do this instead of just using the Google Code
>> tarballs? Yes, I know Google Code will disappear in the future, but
>> right now, it works, and by the time it will be shut down, hopefully
>> this project will have found a new hosting.
> 
> Because I don't see any tarball in Google Code which contains the
> sources. All I see are binary builds:
> 
> https://code.google.com/p/squeezelite/downloads/list?can=1&q=

anyway, I think the git repo on Google Code started working again:

$ git clone https://code.google.com/p/squeezelite/
Initialized empty Git repository in /git-clones/squeezelite/.git/
remote: Counting objects: 845, done.
Receiving objects: 100% (845/845), 286.68 KiB, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (570/570), done.
$

Regards,

Vincent.

> Regards,
> 
> Vincent.
> 
>>
>> Thomas
>>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>