From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Anders <dave123_aml@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Buildroot] Still no answer for a contribution made in March
In-Reply-To: <0c2401c8cc99$baad47c0$0c0514ac@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <561309.27925.qm@web54402.mail.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Ulf,

> 
> Maybe we should start?
> 

i whole heartedly agree there needs to be buildroot releases. the constant state of dev for
buildroot creates a fractured community with many people keeping their own repo of stable builds.

> Other project are using "git" and is sneering at "svn".
> Should we change?
> 

moving to git is a terrible idea, imho. i know this will probably start a flame war, but svn is
far more usable for those of us that use buildroot for commercial products. even offshoots of
OpenEmbedded such as Poky(http://www.pokylinux.org) use svn. just because linus uses it for kernel
doesn't make it a panacea for every project's source code revision control.


Dave